John Carpenter Hints at 'The Thing' Identity, Fan Solves Mystery

The enigmatic ending of John Carpenter's iconic 1982 sci-fi horror film, *The Thing*, has kept fans guessing for 43 years about the fate of R.J. MacReady, portrayed by Kurt Russell, and Childs, played by Keith David. Carpenter deliberately left the conclusion ambiguous, providing no definitive answers—until a recent revelation. At a special 4K screening of *The Thing* at the David Geffen Theater in Los Angeles on March 22, Carpenter hinted to director Bong Joon Ho that a "giant hint" exists within the film, pointing to who ultimately transforms into The Thing. In a playful twist, Carpenter quipped that he'd share this secret with anyone willing to send an undisclosed sum of money to his home in an envelope.

Carpenter also disclosed that the actors themselves were kept in the dark about their characters' fates. "They had no clue," he confessed. "But they had to play it human, you see. The creature imitates perfectly. It could be one of us, it could be somebody in the audience, and there's no way of telling. So I knew, they didn't know."

Following the screening, indie director Joe Russo (not to be confused with the MCU's Joe Russo) shared his theory on X / Twitter, claiming to have uncovered Carpenter's hint. Russo's theory hinges on a crucial detail about the creature's ability to replicate at the cellular level, advising that characters should only consume items they've personally handled. Despite this knowledge, MacReady shares his liquor with Childs at the film's end. Russo suggests this act could mean MacReady, having possibly forgotten the rule, is actually The Thing. "As soon as Childs drinks from the bottle, The Thing has won," Russo asserts. "It's beaten its most skeptical, final threat."

Carpenter's film masterfully ends without confirming Russo's theory, maintaining its mystery. However, Russo bolstered his argument with further analysis. He pointed out the film's final line, "Why don't we just wait here for a little while, see what happens?" which aligns with MacReady being The Thing. Additionally, Russo questioned whether viewers witnessed MacReady killing The Thing or a "BETTER imitation kill a POORER imitation" to better infiltrate society upon rescue.

The 25 Best Horror Movies

26 Images

While some fans were convinced by Russo's theory, others maintained their belief that Childs is the creature, citing his unexplained absence before the final scene. One fan remarked, "I still think it’s Childs because we don’t know his whereabouts for a long time heading into the final scene. But Keith David will tell you he’s 100% not The Thing." Russo responded, "Carpenter said both actors don't know... Childs always felt like a red herring to me."

Regardless of the ongoing debate, Carpenter's ability to keep fans engaged and theorizing decades later is a testament to his storytelling prowess. His occasional insights continue to enrich the legacy of *The Thing*.